Tampilkan postingan dengan label film. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label film. Tampilkan semua postingan

Rabu, 07 Maret 2012

FILM REVIEW: A Separation


The Iranian film A Separation has received uniformly positive reviews from critics, sporting a jaw-dropping 99% rating on rottentomatoes.com (94% from the audience). It won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film this year  for writer-director Asghar Farhadi and its screenplay was given an Oscar nomination in the Original Screenplay category (losing to Woody Allen's Midnight in Paris, despite Allen's alleged comment that he thought A Separation was the Best Film of the Year) despite all the dialogue of the film is in Farsi (There are English subtitles). It is considered the best-reviewed film release of 2011.

A Separation is an astonishing film achievement. The screenplay is truly outstanding, and as the New York Times notes (in a beautifully written rave review):
It is a rigorously honest movie about the difficulties of being honest, a film that tries to be truthful about the slipperiness of truth. It also sketches a portrait — perhaps an unnervingly familiar picture for American audiences — of a society divided by sex, generation, religion and class.
The partial split between Nader and Simin is only one of the schisms revealed in the course of a story that quietly and shrewdly combines elements of family melodrama and legal thriller. 
So what exactly is the film about? Well, it's centered around the marital difficulties of Nader and Simin, a middle-class Iranian married couple who have a teenage daughter named Termeh. Nader works at a bank, and his wife Simin appears to be either a teacher or a professor. The movie begins with the two of them confronting an Iranian magistrate and an emotionally taut scene ensues where we find out that Simin is trying to get a divorce from Nader so that she can go to the United States, which, after waiting for 6 months, she has finally received a visa that will allow the entire family to go. But, the visa will expire in 40 days and Nader insists that he can not leave his father, who has an advanced case of Alzheimer's Disease behind. Simin wants the divorce so she can take her daughter with her to America so she doesn't have to live in Iran "under these circumstances." Nader refuses to give permission to allow his daughter to leave with his future ex-wife, noting that the daughter is living with him, having been abandoned by her mother, who has left the marital home to live with her parents. What do you mean, "these circumstances" asks the disembodied voice of the judge, but Nader knows that she can not answer this question without communicating a non-implicit critique of the Iranian theocratic government, so she remains quiet. For the western audience watching the movie it is an astonishing feat by writer-director Farhadi that the Iranian censors left the scene in the movie presumably due to the plausible interpretation of Simin's comments that she was referring to the domestic circumstances of her home life, not the domestic circumstances of the her country. It is the ability of the movie to communicate subtle commentary on the immediate situation depicted in the movie while also communicating a critique of the Iranian system at the same time makes A Separation an absolutely thrilling experience. As Kevin Turan of the Los Angeles Times says in his rave review of the movie, "A Separation is totally foreign and achingly familiar. It's a thrilling domestic drama that offers acute insights into human motivations and behavior as well as a compelling look at what goes on behind a particular curtain that almost never gets raised."

The movie repeatedly and effectively uses this double lens to provide commentary on  several institutions in Iran, such as the  legal/conflict resolution system, the class divide, the role of religion in society, gender relations and the nature of "truth" and "honor." In addition, for Westerners to get a close-up view of the way regular Iranians live in the city of Tehran is absolutely fascinating. The first thing one notices is how similar and comparable life in Iran looks,with completely recognizable situations and living arrangements. A Separation is a brilliant example of the importance of foreign films to educate Americans about the way the rest of the world lives. The story proceeds through a masterful plot which cranks up the suspense and stakes like the ever increasing bindings on a corset, compressing the audience so that it becomes harder and harder to breather as the movie unspools. Through a series of perfectly reasonable, small mistakes in judgment and ill-considered actions, the stakes in a dispute get raised higher and higher until we are literally looking at a case of life and death from something which basically starts off as an employer-employee misunderstanding.

In the end, though, the movie returns full circle to the dispute around which all the other disputes that spiraled out of control revolved around: the separation of Simin of Nader. However, there is a child involved and in an echo of the great Kramer v Kramer the question of which parent will get child custody becomes central. The ending of the film left me and the Other Half discussing it for hours and days afterwards, as we tried to glean the future lives and decisions of the characters from the insight provided by Farhadi in his brilliant script.


This is a movie that will remain with you for a long time, and that you will enjoy tremendously while watching it and afterwards as well.

TitleA Separation.
Director: Asghar Farhadi.
Running Time: 2 hours, 3 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for mature thematic material.
Release Date: December 30, 2011.
Viewing Date: March 3, 2012.

Plot: A+.
Acting: A.
Visuals: A.
Impact: A+.

Overall Grade: A+/A (4.16/4.0).

Jumat, 02 Maret 2012

FUSION 2012: LGBT POC Film Festival in 3 Weeks


The 2012 Fusion LGBT People of Color film festival is March 22-25th in Los Angeles. I have attended several editions of this film festival over the years, which is sui generis in its focus on screening moving images of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people of color.

You can read my coverage of the 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011 editions of the film festival, which is a project of OutFest, the Los Angeles Lesbian and Gay Film festival.

I am going to buy a Crew Member/Fusion Pass for $50 which apparently brings all the following benefits:
A ticket for- Gala screening of THE SKINNY and after party- FUSION SHORTS PROGRAM 1 and 2- CHUTNEY POPCORN- OUTSET SHORTS PROGRAM- CAR WASH dance-and-singalong- STUD LIFE- JOTALOGUES performance
as well as supporting the organization which makes sure that future editions of the event occur! The Skinny is the third feature film from Patrik-Ian Polk, the creator-director of the black gay television series Noah's Arc and writer-director of the classic film Punks and Jumping the Broom.

Minggu, 26 Februari 2012

2012 OSCARS: The Winners!


  • Best Picture: The Artist
  • Best Director: Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist
  • Best Actress: Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady
  • Best Actor: Jean Dujardin, The Artist
  • Best Supporting Actress: Octavia Spencer, The Help
  • Best Supporting Actor: Christopher Plummer, Beginners
  • Best Original Screenplay: Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris
  • Best Adapted Screenplay: Alexander Payne & Nat Faxon & Jim Rash, The Descendants

Looks like I got 7 of 8 correct in my predictions. I would have been happy with either Viola Davis or Meryl Streep winning, but I'm very happy with the result. I'm pretty sure Viola will have another chance to win. Meryl will get more nominations but never win another.

The Artist and Hugo tied with 5 Oscars each, with The Artist winning the big prizes (Picture, Director, Actor, Score, Costume) with Hugo winning technical awards (Cinematography, Art Direction, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing and Visual Effects).

Minggu, 12 Februari 2012

2012 OSCARS: Predicting The Winners


Best Picture 

The Descendants
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
The Help
Tree of Life
War Horse


SHOULD WIN: The Artist
WILL WIN: The Artist

Best Director
SHOULD WIN: Michael Hazanavicius, The Artist
WILL WIN: Michael Hazanavicius, The Artist

Best Actress
SHOULD WIN: Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady
WILL WIN: Viola Davis, The Help

Best Actor
SHOULD WIN: Jean Dujardins, The Artist
WILL WIN: Jean Dujardins, The Artist

Best Supporting Actress
  • Berenice BejoThe Artist
  • Jessica Chastain, The Help
  • Melissa McCarthy, Bridesmaids
  • Janet McTeer, Albert Nobbs
  • Octavia Spencer, The Help
SHOULD WIN: Berenice BejoThe Artist
WILL WIN: Olivia Spencer, The Help

Best Supporting Actor
  • Kenneth Branagh, My Week With Marilyn
  • Jonah Hill,  Moneyball
  • Nick Nolte, Warrior
  • Christopher Plummer,  Beginners
  • Max Von Sydow, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
SHOULD WIN: Christopher Plummer,  Beginners
WILL WIN:  Christopher Plummer,  Beginners

Best Original Screenplay
  • Michael Hazanavicius, The Artist
  • Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo, Bridesmaids
  • J.C. Chandor, Margin Call
  • Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris
  • Asghar Farhadi, A Separation
SHOULD WIN: Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo, Bridesmaids
WILL WIN:  Asghar Farhadi, A Separation

Best Adapted Screenplay
  • Alexander Payne, Nat Faxton and Jim Rash, The Descendants
  • John Logan, Hugo
  • Aaron Sorkin, Steve Zaillian, and Stan Chervin, Moneyball
  • George Clooney, Grant Heslov and Beau Willimon, The Ides of March
  • Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughan,  Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
SHOULD WIN: Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughan,  Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
WILL WIN: Alexander Payne, Nat Faxton and Jim Rash, The Descendants



Kamis, 22 Desember 2011

FILM REVIEW: Tinker, Sailor, Soldier, Spy


I saw Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy at the Landmark Theaters E-Street Cinema in Washington, D.C. with some co-workers. I had never read the John Le Carrré’s classic bestselling novel on which the film is based or seen the classic BBC adaptation starring the great Sir Alec Guinness but I had heard a radio interview with Gary Oldman  which intrigued me.

The basic outline of the story is about the search for a possible Russian double agent at the very top echelons of the British Intelligence Service (called M.I.-6) in the mid 1970s at the height of the Cold War between the West and the Soviet Bloc. There are four main suspects, codenamed (you guessed it) "Tinker," "Tailor," "Soldier," and "Poor Man" with "Beggarman" being the codename given to the main protagonist portrayed by Oldman, whose character's name is George Smiley.

The movie is set in London in the 1970s and the filmmakers have taken their charge very seriously, meticulously re-creating a 1970s workplace with a striking lack of racial or ethnic diversity, ubiquitous smoking and inappropriate social situations. Watching the movie in 2011 one is also immediately struck by the lack of technology we take for granted: no computers, no cell phones (not even cordless phones!), no satellite/GPS technology.

The investigation into the mole involves a lot of examination of papers and starts off incredibly slowly. For the first ten minutes of the movie there is almost no dialogue and almost no action to speak of. I believe the film makers are trying to put the audience in the position of the characters where both groups are starting with no information and trying to piece together what is going on from various cues and small, disconnected bits of information.

In fact, communication and the movement of information (or intelligence) between individuals is a central theme of the film. Multiple times, a question is asked of one character to another and the director cuts to a different scene without explicitly depicting the answer to the question being given. The audience is required to infer the answer to the question from subsequent scenes and actions by the characters. This is similar to how Oldman's Smiley has to infer the answers to questions he has about the motivations behind the actions of his four "old friends" who are now his main suspects for betraying their country.

Oldman's Smiley is a quiet, horn-rimmed glasses and tweed-jacket wearing middle-aged British bloke. He looks more like an accountant than an international spy with a license to kill. Most of the "action" per se is in watching Oldman's reactions as he doggedly chases the truth and he sifts through the responses people are giving him to his questions. However, as the movie unspools the pace accelerates faster and faster, like a ball of twine rolling down hill. The audience has to pay more and closer attention to keep hold of the thread.

The rest of the cast is also stellar, featuring John Hurt, 2011 Best Actor Oscar-winner Colin Firth, Inception's Tom Hardy and PBS's Sherlock Ian Cumberbatch.

TitleTinker Tailor Soldier Spy.
Director: Tomas Alfredson.
Running Time: 2 hours, 8 minutes.
MPAA Rating: Rated R for violence, some sexuality/nudity and language.
Release Date: December 9, 2011.
Viewing Date: December 16, 2011.

 Plot: A.
Acting: A.
Visuals: B+.
Impact: B-.

Overall Grade: (3.5/4.0).